Legal Opinion
MARTIN AND HARRIS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MERCK & CO., INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 23, 2025No. 2:23-cv-23418Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MARTIN AND HARRIS PRIVATE Civil Action No.: 23-23418 LIMITED Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER v. MERCK & CO., INC. Defendant. CECCHI, District Judge. Before the Court is the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 6) (“Mot.”) plaintiff Martin and Harris Private Limited’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint (ECF No. 1) (“Cmplt.”) on grounds of forum non conveniens filed by defendant Merck & Co., Inc. (“Defendant”).1 Plaintiff opposed the motion (ECF No. 17) (“Opp.”) and Defendant replied in support (ECF No. 18) (“Reply”).2 The motion is decided without…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Eurofins Pharma US Holdings v. BioAlliance Pharma SACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Lacey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.