Legal Opinion
United States v. Reserve Mining Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 15, 1972No. 5-72 Civ. 19PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILES W. LORD, District Judge.
- The Court has before it some 15 motions for intervention in this lawsuit. There are 4 applications for intervention as plaintiffs by (1) the State of Wisconsin; (2) the State of Michigan; (3) the Minnesota Environmental Law Institute, Inc., Northern Environmental Council, and Save Lake Superior Association; and (4) the Michigan Student Environmental Confederation, Inc. There are 11 applications for intervention as defendants by (1) Lake County; (2) St. Louis County; (3) the Village of Babbitt; (4) the Village of Silver Bay; (5) the Village of Beaver Bay;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Smuck v. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Carl C. Smuck, a Member of the Board of Education of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson, Carl F. Hansen, Superintendent of Schools of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mausolf v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. City of Jackson, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Reserve Mining Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Jet Traders Investment Corp. v. Tekair, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- United States v. Rohm & Haas Company and Rohm & Haas of Texas, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.