Legal Opinion

Warren v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1949No. Civ. 16843PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of a fall upon a sidewalk in the city of Los Angeles, defendant city appeals.

Facts

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff (respondent) the facts in the instant case are:

On September 10, 1946, about 12:05 p. m. plaintiff was walking on the sidewalk on the west side of Main Street in defendant city approximately 2 or 3 feet from the west curb. He stepped on a fan shaped wet spot about 2 feet wide and 3 feet long, the narrow…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Balkwill v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Barker v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Jones v. City of South San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Fielder v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Gentekos v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API