Legal Opinion

Mahorney v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 8, 2002No. 96,726PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.

T1 The appellant, John H. Mahorney, a prisoner, filed four petitions in the district court against four different prison officials working at the Diamondback Correctional Facility, in which he is incarcerated. He alleged a constitutional right to smoke, and claimed that the correctional officers violated that right. When Mahorney petitioned for pauper status so that court costs would be waived, the trial court ordered certain information to verify his alleged status. After Mahorney provided the requested documents from the correctional facility concerning his trust account, the trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. LCR, INC. v. Linwood PropertiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Cumbey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. District Court, Fifteenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Foust v. PearmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Ada v. ArlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mehdipour v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Cotner v. GoldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Mehdipour v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. Mahorney v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API