Warren v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to rape, his punishment being fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of forty years.
The defense was insanity. During the day in the center of the city of Lancaster, at a place where many people were within call, the appellant, a negro man, made an assault upon a white woman. When persons attracted by her screams came to her aid the appellant protested against interference with his business. Considering the time, place and nature of the assault, it is difficult to reconcile it with the act of a rational…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- English v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Echols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- House v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Ex Parte QuesadaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Manning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gephart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Pena v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Jamail v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Carlisle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Monchego v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.