Legal Opinion

Jamail v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 1925No. 8299PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.

In the indictment, the appellant J. M. Jamail, Aubrey Bingham, and Mattie Bingham were charged with the offense. John Johnston was named as the injured party.- The property taken consisted of four fur coats, two fur capes and three fur scarfs.

The testimony of John Johnston, Neal O’Hare, William Johnston and Henry Johnston was -introduced by the State. None of these witnesses were present at the time of the trial but had given testimony upon the examining trial which…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Ripley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Millner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Pace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Clay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Maden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Ogburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Gary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API