Jamail v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The offense is robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.
In the indictment, the appellant J. M. Jamail, Aubrey Bingham, and Mattie Bingham were charged with the offense. John Johnston was named as the injured party.- The property taken consisted of four fur coats, two fur capes and three fur scarfs.
The testimony of John Johnston, Neal O’Hare, William Johnston and Henry Johnston was -introduced by the State. None of these witnesses were present at the time of the trial but had given testimony upon the examining trial which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Ripley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Millner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Pace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Clay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Maden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Ogburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Gary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.