Legal Opinion

Mills' Succession v. Manasseh

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1933No. 4514PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

On January 17, 1927, Oscar G. Manasseh, a defendant, executed a promissory note for $1,742.67, payable to his own order and by him indorsed, due on or before three years from da'te, with 7 per cent, per annum interest from date. There is a stipulation in the note that payments thereon shall be at the rate of $20 per month beginning one month from its date. To secure payment of this note with 10 per cent, attorney's fees, the maker, on the date of note, by authentic act, specially mortgaged and hypothecated certain real estate in the city of Shreveport. Thereafter, to wit,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morris v. Executors of CainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  2. Isaacs v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. Simon v. McMeelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  4. Rhys v. MoodySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. Mutual National Bank v. CocoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Li Rocchi v. KeenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  2. Thompson v. Twin City Finance Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1976
  3. Southern Sav. Ass'n v. Lorac, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Reynolds v. Succession of WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Ascension Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MartinezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API