Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Fulis
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 1, 1994No. 93-571PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The plaintiff, Robert Douglas, individually and as father and next friend of Lindsay Douglas, brings this interlocutory appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Gray, J.) dismissing one count of his writ of summons. The plaintiff seeks recovery, pursuant to RSA 466:19 (Supp. 1989) (current version at RSA 466:19 (1992)) (the statute), for mental and emotional injuries incurred as a result of witnessing the defendants’ dog attack his daughter. The plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in dismissing the count for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm.
In August 1989, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Corso v. MerrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Siciliano v. Capitol City Shows, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Bolduc v. Herbert Schneider Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Wilder v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sweeney v. Ragged Mountain Ski Area, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Duguay v. Androscoggin Valley Hosp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Marc Chartier, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Lisa Chartier v. Apple Therapy of Londonderry, LLC & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2023