Church & Dwight Co., Inc. v. Huey
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
A jury found that appellant, Church & Dwight Company, Inc., had violated the DTPA by making misrepresentations about its product, Armex Blast Media, to appellee, Michael Huey, who wanted to use the product to remove paint from the window frames of San Antonio’s historic Travis Building. The jury awarded Huey actual damages of $9,830, additional damages under the DTPA of $50,000, and attorneys’ fees. The trial judge added $2,000 in statutory penalties and reduced the additional damages to $17,660. In ten points of error, Church & Dwight claims that the verdict…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- U.S. Tire-Tech, Inc. v. Boeran, B.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- General Motors Corp. v. Harper, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2001
- Drury Southwest, Inc. v. Louie Ledeaux 1, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
- Schouest v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.