Legal Opinion

United States v. Langley

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 26, 1990No. ACMR 8801826PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MYERS, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of one specification of assault with intent to commit rape in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982). His sentence, approved by the convening authority, included a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for five years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El. On appeal appellant alleges the errors discussed below.

I

VOLUNTARY INTOXICATION

Appellant first contends that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. McFarlinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. SimmelkjaerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. United States v. BoxU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. LangleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API