Langford v. Few
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Ripley Circuit Court — Hon. John Q-. Wear, Judge. (1) The execution offered in evidence, and the return of the constable thereon, with the other proceedings of the constable under said execution, is sufficient to show that the respondent had no property subject to said execution; and the return thereon is, in fact, a return of nulla bona in this proceeding. R. S. 1889, secs. 4907,6286-7; Baconv. Beven, 44 Miss. 293; Stateex rel. v; Brady, 53 Mo. App. 202; Halev.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Ripley Circuit Court — Hon. John Q-. Wear, Judge. (1) The execution offered in evidence, and the return of the constable thereon, with the other proceedings of the constable under said execution, is sufficient to show that the respondent had no property subject to said execution; and the return thereon is, in fact, a return of nulla bona in this proceeding. R. S. 1889, secs. 4907,6286-7; Baconv. Beven, 44 Miss. 293; Stateex rel. v; Brady, 53 Mo. App. 202; Halev. Talbott, 86 Ind. 447; State v. Still, 11 Mo. App. 283. (2) Irregularities in the judgment and execution under which the…
1Opinion of the CourtMabshall, J.
Action in ejectment to recover the south half of the northwest quarter of section 8, township 24, range 1, East, in Ripley county. The answer is a general denial and plea of homestead rights. The *145reply is a general denial. Plaintiff’s evidence is: 1st, a deed from the sheriff of Ripley county, dated October 18, 1893, recorded March 2, 1894, reciting that on November 7, 1892, Wm. P. Morrison recovered a judgment against defendant before a justice of the peace in said county; that a transcript of the judgment was filed in the circuit clerk’s office on the 13th of December, 1892, and upon which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. AmoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- Franse v. OwensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
- Dillon v. RashSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- Metcalf v. GilletSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824
- Burk v. FlurnoySupreme Court of Missouri · 1835
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leachman v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Littlefield v. RamseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Mason v. ChaseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- Merrick v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- McDonnell v. Nash-Smith Tea & Coffee Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910