Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Parra
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 3, 2000No. C-3-99-383PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART, AS MOOT, OHIO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 33); PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. #38) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS; TERMINATION ENTRY.
RICE, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon two Motions. First, Defendants Gail Price and Wanda Deardurff have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #33) on- Plaintiff Steven Coleman’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against them in their individual capacity. 1 Second, Plaintiffs Steven and Janet Coleman have…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rynn v. JaffeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- MJM Holdings Inc. v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019