Legal Opinion
Miller v. Retirement Board of Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 15, 2001No. 1—00—1549PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cousins
The plaintiffs, a class of Chicago police officers who worked past age 63, brought a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) against the Retirement Board of the Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago (the Board). Plaintiffs alleged that the Board’s application of Public Act 86—272 (Pub. Act 86—272, eff. August 23, 1989), which amended the Illinois Pension Code (the Code) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 108½, par. 5—101 et seq.), deprived them of a constitutionally protected property interest in pension benefits without due process of law.
On October 1, 1998, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Pension Reform LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
- Fields v. Elected Officials' Retirement PlanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Underwood v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Pendergast v. Arizona State Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Miller v. RETIREMENT BD. POLICEMEN'S ANNU.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.