Factor v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
Merchandise described in the report of the appraiser as “pencils, being a shell of wood containing an unctuous material used by actors in their make-up,” was assessed for duty by the collector at 75 per *402centum ad valorem under paragraph 62 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:
Pak. 62. Perfumery, including cologne and other toilet waters, articles of perfumery, whether in sachets or otherwise, and all preparations used as applications to the hair, mouth, teeth, or skin, such as cosmetics, dentifrices, tooth soaps, pastes, theatrical grease paints, pomades, powders, and other…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Sandoz Chemical WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Novelty Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Thompson Hayward Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- Upton, Bradeen & James, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- American Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.