Claughton v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
1. A motion to set aside a verdict and judgment is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case. McDonald v. State, 126 Ga. 536 (55 S. E. 235); Brown v. State, 150 Ga. 585 (104 S. E. 428); Hughes v. State, 159 Ga. 818 (5) (127 S. E. 109); Gravitt v. State, 165 Ga. 779 (3) (142 S. E. 100).
2. A motion for new trial is an available remedy to the defendant for setting aside the verdict in a criminal case. The motions in these eases can not be construed as motions for new trials; but if such construction were possible, the motions would be fatally defective for the reason that no brief of evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Gravitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Waits v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.