Legal Opinion

Claughton v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1934No. Nos. 10221, 10222PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. A motion to set aside a verdict and judgment is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case. McDonald v. State, 126 Ga. 536 (55 S. E. 235); Brown v. State, 150 Ga. 585 (104 S. E. 428); Hughes v. State, 159 Ga. 818 (5) (127 S. E. 109); Gravitt v. State, 165 Ga. 779 (3) (142 S. E. 100).

2. A motion for new trial is an available remedy to the defendant for setting aside the verdict in a criminal case. The motions in these eases can not be construed as motions for new trials; but if such construction were possible, the motions would be fatally defective for the reason that no brief of evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Gravitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. Waits v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API