Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1967No. 43086PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

After the terms of court at which the prisoner pleaded nolo contendere and was sentenced for the offense of kidnaping, he filed a motion captioned “Extraordinary Motion for Relief.” The motion, contending that the indictment was void because of systematic exclusion of Negroes from the grand jury and that the plea of nolo contendere was coerced, prayed that the judgment be set aside or that the sentence be commuted to the time already served. Held:

The prisoner could have filed a challenge to the array of grand jurors before indictment; and upon arraignment he could have…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reece v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Miraglia v. BrysonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Blevins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. State v. KightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Fuller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Barber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API