Legal Opinion
Mystic S. S. Co. v. Stromland
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 3, 1927No. 2608PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Circuit Judge.
The appellees were libelants and appellant the respondent in the District Court, and will be so styled here.
On the 3d of October, 1925, at Baltimore, Md., the libelants were taken on board the steamship Walter D. Noyes, then engaged in the coastwise trade between Hampton Roads and New England ports, as workaways, and regularly employed as vacancies occurred in the crew of the vessel. They were thereafter placed on the ship, and served thereon to the 11th of November, 1925, as shown by the Noyes pay roll for that period. There was due libelant Stromland $14.66, libelant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'Hara v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Gerber v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Elman v. MollerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- O'Hara v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Southern Cross Steamship Co., Inc. v. Georgios FiripisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Mavromatis v. United Greek Shipowners CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
- Samad v. the Steamship EtivebankDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1955
- James W. Swain, Jr. v. Isthmian Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Forster v. Oro Navigation CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.