O'Hara v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
Petitioners, libellants below, quit the service' of the steamship company and sought to' recover their earned wages on the ground of a violation of § 2 of the Seamen’s Act of March 4, 1015, c. 153, 38 Stat. 1164, copied in the margin. 1 Omitting the various provisions with which we are not here concerned, the pertinent requirement of that section is that “ the sailors shall, while at sea, be divided into at least two, and the firemen, oilers, and water tenders into at least three watches, which shall be kept on duty successively for the performance of ordinary work incident to the sailing and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Pacific Mail S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
- Northern Commercial Co. v. LindblomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Flint & P. M. R. Co. v. Marine Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1895
- Stuart v. City of EastonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1896
3Cited by64 opinions
- Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McCrea v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Dougherty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.