Legal Opinion

Mackey v. Kerwin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. J. W. Mack, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Scott

The decree of the circuit court of Cook county, from which this appeal is prosecuted, finds that Michael S. Kerwin, who filed' the bill in this cause for partition and accounting, is the owner in fee simple of an undivided one-fourth of certain real estate in the city of Chicago, that James J. Mackey is the owner of the remaining three-fourths, and that appellant has no interest in the land sought to be partitioned. It further finds that the appellant has received rents and profits from the premises and that there is now due from her to the owners thereof, on account of such rents and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sweetland v. TuthillIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nowak v. DombrowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Dunbar v. SpringerIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Whitney-Kemmerer v. KearnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API