Deal v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Jerry Wayne Deal was convicted of criminal mischief in the second degree, AS 11-46.482(a)(1). He appeals, contending that the trial court improperly denied a motion for judgment of acquittal, based on insufficiency of the evidence, which he made at the conclusion of the prosecution’s case-in-chief at trial. We affirm.
In advancing his claim, Deal relies on the proposition that, to decide the sufficiency of evidence at trial, we must restrict our consideration to evidence presented in the state’s case-in-chief. Deal impliedly concedes that sufficient evidence may be found to support his…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Earl R. Cephus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Sandra E. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. James Fred Rhodes, Jr., A/K/A Allan DuncorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
- Martin v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Sluka v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
- Houston-Hult v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
- S.R.D. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.