Hicks, Exec'r. v. . Skinner and Wife .

This case was fully and ably argued at last term, as it has been at this term, and the opinion of brother Rodman-for the Court, and the dissenting opinion of brother Bynum, were exhaustive as to all the questions involved, as will clearly appear by reference thereto. Nevertheless, the amount involved, the intricacy of the questions, the absence of the Chief Justice at last term, and the dissent of brother Bye dm, made it not inappropriate on the part of the plaintiff against whom our decision was, to ash a re-hearing at this term. It is, however, proper that we should repeat here what we said…