Legal Opinion

Hall v. Cameron

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Limestoue Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. James E. Horton, Jr. Bill by John C. Hill against W. W. Cameron and others, to enjoin and restrain them from putting into effect quarantine for the purpose of carrying on the work of tick eradication. From a decree dissolving the temporary injunction, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, J. —

This appeal is from the decree of the chancellor of the Northern chancery division, entered June 4, 1915, dissolving the temporary injunction theretofore issued in the cause. The bill shows that the complainant, a resident of Limestone county, Ala., is the owner of certain cattle, which are in his possession in said county, and that these respondents, acting under an order of the commissioners’ court of Limestone county, claimed the right, under assumed authority as inspectors of cattle in the work of tick eradication, to force owners of cattle in said county to “dip” the same,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blue v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Board of Commissioners v. Orr.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. State v. McCartyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Ferguson v. Commissioners' CourtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Rembert v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  2. State v. FriedkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Blount v. Sixteenth St. Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Cassell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Harris v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API