Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Glickman
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided October 24, 1975PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartha Zelman, J.
This action was submitted to the court by all attorneys pursuant to an agreed statement of facts for disposition by the court.
The defendant, Richard Glickman (hereinafter referred to as Glickman) while engaged in his employment, was struck by a "hit and run” motor vehicle on April 5, 1973, the owner and operator of which could not be found, as a result of which Glickman sustained serious personal injuries. Defendant Glickman received benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Law totaling a sum of $2,952 for compensation and medical benefits paid by Hartford Accident Indemnity Company…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Durant & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- In re the Arbitration between Napolitano & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Erie Insurance Co. v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Shutter v. Philips Display Components Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Midland Ins. Co. v. ColatrellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Pullen v. Travelers InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.