Legal Opinion
CAT Internet Systems Inc. v. Providence Washington Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 25, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-3238PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Before me are the motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs CAT Internet Services, Inc. (“CAT”) and Internet Supply, Inc. (“ISI”) and the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Providence Washington Insurance Company (“Providence Washington”) and York Insurance Company (‘Work”). The motions address the duty of the defendant insurance companies to defend the plaintiff insureds against a civil action brought by an on-line retailer of magazine subscriptions, magazines.com Inc.. For the reasons stated below, I will grant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co., Inc., in No. 98-7552 v. The Travelers Insurance Company (d.c. Civ. No. 98-Cv-00643) the Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co., Inc., in No. 98-7553 v. United States Fire Insurance Company (d.c. Civ. No. 98-Cv-00758)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mutual Benefit Insurance v. HaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. United States Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Biborosch v. Transamerica InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aearo Corp. v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2009
- Cat Internet Sys. v. PROVIDENCE WASH. INS.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Berlin v. Maryland Casualty Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County2002
- DeSabato v. Assurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016