Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 4, 1986No. 85-4141PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
This case concerns questions of the applicability and constitutionality of acts of Congress pertaining to certain rail passenger services as well as questions whether the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC or Commission), respondent here, has jurisdiction to determine the compensation owed by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), intervenor here, to the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company (Metro-North) (jointly referred to as *290Metro), petitioners here, for Amtrak’s use…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986