Legal Opinion

Redalen v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1993No. C3-93-185PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Relator Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company (Farm Bureau) challenges a decision issued by the representative of respondent Commissioner of Jobs and Training, which held that Farm Bureau’s employee, respondent Steven Redalen, was entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits. We reverse.

FACTS

Redalen worked as an agent and manager for Farm Bureau from February 1, 1976 until May 1, 1992. In 1988, he allegedly began sexually harassing another employee, Kathryn Chiglo. Chiglo subsequently resigned from Farm Bureau. On May 5, 1989, Chiglo commenced a lawsuit accusing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Reed v. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Golden Valley, District 5Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Gradine v. College of St. ScholasticaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Knutson v. DJM Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Demming v. Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  2. Patrick H. Horan, Relator v. Centerline Charter Corp., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API