Legal Opinion

Osterloh v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1983No. 14222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTLEY, Justice.

The issue before us is whether respondents Fred and Carolyn Osterloh, plaintiffs in the action below, can quiet title to a small piece of property, part of which is being used by appellant State of Idaho’s Lava Hot Springs Foundation.1 The property is located adjacent to the Portneuf River, in the village of Lava Hot Springs, Bannock County. It was part of a larger parcel obtained from the U.S. Government by patent in 1904, by John Hall.

Hall’s property, which we will refer to as lot 2, was bordered on the north by the Portneuf River. On the other side of the river was lot 7,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gardner v. FliegelIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Callahan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Morris v. FrandsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Lisher v. KrasseltIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. HirzelIdaho Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Devil Creek Ranch, Inc. v. Cedar Mesa Reservoir & Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Golden Condor, Inc. v. BellIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Golden Condor, Inc. v. BellIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API