Legal Opinion

McSweeney v. McSweeney

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1996No. 95APF 12-1592PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reilly, Judge.

Appellant, Daniel F. McSweeney, appeals from a decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations, sustaining the motion for relief from judgment of appellee, Daphne L. McSweeney, and vacating the parties’ decree of dissolution. Appellant presents the following assignments of error:

First Assignment of Error

“The trial court erred, as a matter of law, in determining that it was proper for the appellee to amend her rule 60(B) motion because a motion in Ohio is not subject to amendment under the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure nor by any other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cedar Bay Construction, Inc. v. City of FremontOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Quebodeaux v. QuebodeauxOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gursky v. Gursky, Unpublished Decision (10-24-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Kostoglou v. Da Trucking Excavating, Inc., 06-Ma-77 (6-25-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. WagnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Lane, 07ap-1015 (10-16-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API