Legal Opinion
State v. Ramos
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 28, 1990No. 8608PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motions to withdraw his plea entered pursuant to the Alford doctrine.1 The defendant entered his plea to the charge of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70. He was initially charged with a second count of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21, but that charge was nolled by the state at the time of sentencing as part of the plea agreement.2 On August 7, 1989, the trial court conducted a thorough canvass of the defendant pursuant to Practice Book §§ 711 and 712, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gaston County v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. ChildreeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Szarwak v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. GambleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Ramos v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. DomianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. VelezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. WidemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.