Kamor v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
Two unusual features mark the instant case. One is factual; the other is procedural. The first is the uniqueness of a jury returning a verdict for an insurance company in a suit on a burglary policy by an insured mercantile partnership of husband and wife. This verdict was based on either a conclusion that insured failed to meet technical requirements under the policy’s provisions or that plaintiffs failed to establish the amount of their loss. The procedural feature was entry of a judgment awarding plaintiffs the amount admittedly owed by the insurer after a verdict was returned…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Associated Mutuals Inc. v. Pope Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Bailey v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Heard v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Jordan v. DownsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doctors Hospital of Augusta, Inc. v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Cline v. KehsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Byrom v. FelkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Coleman v. Argonaut InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975