Legal Opinion

Kamor v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 7, 1974No. 49456PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

Two unusual features mark the instant case. One is factual; the other is procedural. The first is the uniqueness of a jury returning a verdict for an insurance company in a suit on a burglary policy by an insured mercantile partnership of husband and wife. This verdict was based on either a conclusion that insured failed to meet technical requirements under the policy’s provisions or that plaintiffs failed to establish the amount of their loss. The procedural feature was entry of a judgment awarding plaintiffs the amount admittedly owed by the insurer after a verdict was returned…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Associated Mutuals Inc. v. Pope Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. Bailey v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Heard v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Jordan v. DownsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doctors Hospital of Augusta, Inc. v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Cline v. KehsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Byrom v. FelkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Coleman v. Argonaut InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API