Legal Opinion

Byrom v. Felker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1976No. 51675PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

"There comes a point where this Court should not be ignorant as judges of what we know as men,” wrote Justice Frankfurter in Watts v. Indiana, 338 U. S. 49, 52 (1949). Those words are applicable to this appeal where the jury used the Alexandrian device of cutting the Gordian knot in resolving the complexities which the veniremen faced in expressing their verdict. These complications arose from a joint trial of two suits along with a third-party action against one of the plaintiffs and the third-party defendant’s cross action. We too will use a similarly direct technique in that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Maloy v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Hieber v. WattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Anglin v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Boatright v. SosebeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ballew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Moore v. TCI Cablevision of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Trowell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Calhoun v. BrananCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Bond v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API