Legal Opinion
Jamison v. Charles F. Cullom & Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 5, 1903No. 14,182PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from • Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred D. King, Judge. Action by Irwin Jamison against Charles F. Cullom & Co. and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
This is an action in damages against Charles F. Cullom & Co., and Charles F. Cullom and George K. Pratt, as members of that firm, predicated upon the *784following contract and correspondence, to wit:
“No. 415 Carondelet St., New Orleans, La., Sept. 27, 1899. The following contract is this day entered into between Irwin Jami-son and Charles F. Cullom & Co. All sand to be used by Chas. F. Cullom & Co., on their contract with the Drainage Commission, delivered on the New Basin in such places as may be desired, at the rate of ninety-five cents per cubic yard, on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Case v. WatsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870
- Louisiana Bank v. Kenner's SuccessionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1830
- Derbigny v. MondelliSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
- King v. GanttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
- Medley v. Pannill's adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1842
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harding v. WattigneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Roe v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Jordan v. Checker Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hartman-Salmen Co. v. MaloneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Thompson v. Bland Produce Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.