Bright v. Hammond
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 98 — SLANDER The Boyle Circuit Court had no jurisdiction of the action. Civil Code, secs. 763; 74, 78; Bliss on Code Pleading (2d. ed.), sec. 284; Sherrill v. C., O. & S. W. R. R. Co., 89 Ky., 302; Newman’s Pleading & Practice, p. 283; Freeman on Judgments- (2d. ed.) sec. 123; Black on Judgments, p. 261, sec. 215; Black on Judgments, vol. 1, sec. 218. Citations: Bosley v. Mattingly, 14 B. M., 73; Brace v. Shaw, 16 B. M., 80; Dazey v. Killam, 1-Duv., 407; Sedgwick on…
Read the full summary
Case 98 — SLANDER The Boyle Circuit Court had no jurisdiction of the action. Civil Code, secs. 763; 74, 78; Bliss on Code Pleading (2d. ed.), sec. 284; Sherrill v. C., O. & S. W. R. R. Co., 89 Ky., 302; Newman’s Pleading & Practice, p. 283; Freeman on Judgments- (2d. ed.) sec. 123; Black on Judgments, p. 261, sec. 215; Black on Judgments, vol. 1, sec. 218. Citations: Bosley v. Mattingly, 14 B. M., 73; Brace v. Shaw, 16 B. M., 80; Dazey v. Killam, 1-Duv., 407; Sedgwick on Statutory and Constitutional Law, chap. 6. The Boyle Circuit Court h-ad full jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE GUPPY
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an action for slander brought by the appellee against the appellant in the Boyle Circuit Court. It is alleged in the petition that the appellant spoke, of and concerning the appellee, the slanderous words complained of, in the county of Boyle. Summons' was issued and served *762upon appellant in the county of Lincoln. The appellant entered a motion to quash the service of the summons upon the ground that the circuit court of Boyle county had no jurisdiction of the defendant, by reason of service upon him in Lincoln county, which motion was…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Hale v. Barker, District JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1927
- Baker v. FraserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946