Legal Opinion
United States v. Santillan
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 14, 2008No. CR 07-2015 TUC JMRPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN M. ROLL, Chief Judge.
This order resolves the Motion to Suppress filed by defendant Manuel M. Santil-lan in connection with the seizure of a cell phone from him on November 5, 2007, and his subsequent indictment for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana. An evidentiary hearing was conducted on June 30-July 1, 2008. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. 27) is DENIED.
Factual Background
At the evidentiary hearing held in this matter, the evidence consisted of two government witnesses. At…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State of Texas v. Granville, AnthonyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- United States v. QuintanaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Newhard v. BordersDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009
- Smallwood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.