Legal Opinion
Alexander Dawson, Inc. v. Fling
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 30, 1964No. 20376PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frantz.
Alexander Dawson, Inc. (the corporation) sued the Flings for an adjudication of their rights to certain real estate in proceedings under Rule 105, R.C.P. Colo. In their answer, the Flings admitted that they claimed some right, title and interest in the real estate. They also counterclaimed in four counts.
In essence, the counterclaims sought relief in two respects: (1) relief under Rule 105, R.C.P. Colo., as to described real estate which is contiguous to that described in the corporation’s complaint; (2) an adjudication of their rights to the use of Audubon Lake,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bingham v. SaleneOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Miller v. Lutheran Conference and Camp Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Smith v. WilkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. MallorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Bland Lake Fishing and Hunting Club v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Local 9, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio v. Siegrist Construction Co., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Lobato v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Bergen Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. BarnesColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Skidmore v. First Bank of MinneapolisColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.