Legal Opinion
In re Ohlson
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1942PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, petitioner seeks an order directed to the State Commissioner of Motor Vehicles “prohibiting him from suspending petitioner’s license and registration; or in the alternative directing said Commissioner to grant the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to comply with the provisions of article 6-A of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.” The respondent cross-moves for an order dismissing the petition as a matter of law for legal insufficiency.
According to the allegations of the petition, on February 20, 1942 an automobile owned by one Thomas C.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Reitz v. MealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- People v. . RosenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Rosen v. Leibowitz Pickle Works, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schutt v. MacduffNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Ballow v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- Adams v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Toledo v. BernoirOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Department of Public Safety v. GillaspieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.