Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bragg

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1882PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Parent and Child. Habeas Corpus. Certiorari. Practice in Superior Court. Before Judge POTTLE. Elbert Superior Court. September Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Chief Justice.

Bragg, the defendant in error, and his wife parted. She took the child of the marriage, an infant, with her to her brother’s, Smith’s, the plaintiff in error. The child remained there, with the tacit consent of the father, until the mother’s and afterwards the grandmother’s death; and when it got to be nine years old the father brought habeas corpus for it, against Smith, the uncle, before the ordinary. The ordinary left the child with the uncle. On certiorari, the superior court reversed the ordinary and awarded the child to the father, and this judgment is the error…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Desvergers v. KrugerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  2. Edenfield v. CanadySupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  3. Starr v. BartonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1864

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hibbette v. BainesMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Chapin v. CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Sloan v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Hill v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Bond v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API