Innoncente v. Guisti
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtCondon, J.
This is an action of assumpsit to recover a deficiency which was determined by the application of the proceeds of a sale of real estate under a power of sale in a mortgage. Plaintiff’s declaration is in two counts, the first on the promissory note secured by the mortgage, and the second on the common counts. The action was tried in the superior court before a justice sitting without a jury and resulted in a decision for the plaintiff on the common counts. To such decision defendants duly excepted and have brought the case here on their bill of exceptions.
The following facts are undisputed: On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brooklyn Bank v. . BarnabyNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Van Keuren v. . ParmeleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Shoemaker v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Credit Service Corp. v. BarkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Holmquist v. GilbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Faria v. Carol Cable Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987