Legal Opinion

Bohart v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1910No. 500PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Grady County; Frank M. Bailey. Judge. Action 'by J. A. Bohart and another against Mrs. Margaret Anderson. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This proceeding was commenced by the plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, by filing in the district court of Grady county a pleading designated, “Petition in error,” wherein they alleged, in substance, that on the 2'2d day of February, 1908, the defendant in error, Margaret Anderson, commenced an action in replevin before a justice of the peace in and for Chickasha township, Grady county, Okla., against the plaintiffs in error for the recovery of certain live stock; that said plaintiffs in error had a good and valid defense to said suit and intended and desired to file their answer setting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ableman v. RothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Burroughs v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Poor v. TustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Splawn v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Nieman & Northcutt v. MainsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API