Professional Services Supplier, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This contract suit is before the court on cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff argues that the government’s termination for default of the fixed price construction contract in question was improper because the contracting officer failed to provide a written cure notice to the plaintiff prior to the termination. Defendant counters that the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) does not require a cure notice in the case of a fixed-price construction contract. Following consideration of the parties’ submissions and oral argument on this issue, this court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Agosto v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Unified Contractor, Inc. v. Albuquerque Housing Auth.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017