Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Arpagaus v. Todd

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 21, 1947No. 34,544PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

An information in the nature of quo warranto to test the right of respondent to the office of alderman for the twelfth ward of the city of Minneapolis was filed in this court, and a writ issued. The proceeding was instituted with the consent of the attorney general by private relators who are residents, voters, and taxpayers of said ward.

On November 29, 1946, the city council of Minneapolis appointed George Todd, respondent here, to fill a vacancy in the office of aider-man of the twelfth ward. At the next general city election, held June 9, 1947, Todd was elected for a term…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of DoneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. People Ex Rel. Atkins v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. State Ex Rel. Olson v. LangerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. State Ex Rel. Barrett v. SartoriusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Otsuka v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of MoundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Bailey v. BaronianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. EvansSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Melton v. OlesonMontana Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API