Legal Opinion
Rowe v. Cormier
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 1, 1983No. 10333PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole issue in this case is the enforceability by third party beneficiaries of a contract allegedly abandoned by the promisor and promisee. The plaintiffs, Mia Rowe, Elaine DiStasi, Edmund DiStasi, Lawrence DiStasi and Anthony DiStasi, brought an action seeking damages and the imposition of a constructive trust upon real and personal property of the defendant, Leo Paul Cormier. The trial court, after a full hearing, rendered a judgment for the defendant and the plaintiffs have appealed.
In its memorandum of decision, the trial court found the following facts. The plaintiffs were the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Yale Co-Operative Corporation v. RoginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- First Hartford Realty Corp. v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- M. Shapiro & Son Construction Co. v. BattagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc. v. Town of LisbonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Smith & Smith Building Corp. v. DeLucaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.