Legal Opinion

United States v. Ellison

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 19, 2000No. 1:99-cv-00341Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant Kirk Ellison was charged under 16 U.S.C. § 551, 18 U.S.C. § 2, and 36 C.F.R. § 261.10(1) with three counts of violating the terms and conditions of a Department of Agriculture special use permit. Mr. Ellison consented to a trial before Magistrate Judge Watanabe, and was convicted of all three counts. Mr. Ellison appeals that conviction. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3402. I affirm.

I. Facts

The Magistrate Judge found, and the parties do not dispute, the following. Mr. Ellison and his company, Lazy Double FF Outfitting,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API