May v. Daniels
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceRobert L. Brown, Justice
Are the proposed popular name and ballot title so unclear and misleading that this court must strike the amendment from the ballot and deprive the people of this state of an opportunity to vote on it? That is the sole issue before this court today. It is not this court’s function, preelection, to construe the terms of the amendment, determine its constitutionality or legality, delve into its impact in every situation, or even to decide whether its passage would be a good thing or a bad thing. Our law is clear on this point. See, e.g., Roberts v. Priest, 341 Ark. 813, 20 S.W.3d 376 (2000);…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roberts v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Kurrus Ex Rel. Arkansans to Protect Police, Libraries, Education, & Services (APPLES) v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Yarbrough v. WittySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Ferstl v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Parker v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.