Legal Opinion
Palanquet v. Weeks Marine, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 30, 2004No. CV 00-1509(ETB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BOYLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court are three applications for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiffs, Guy and Mary Palanquet (“plaintiffs”) seek judgment as á matter of law establishing the liability of defendant, Weeks Marine, Inc. (“Weeks”), for violation of Section 240(1) of the New York Labor Law. Weeks and third-party defendant, C.B. Contracting Corp. (“C.B.”), oppose the plaintiffs’ motion. Additionally, Weeks requests summary judgment granting a declaratory judgment against, third-party defendant,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McAllister v. G & S INVESTORSDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- PALANQUET v. Weeks Marine, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005