Legal Opinion

Hill v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 10, 2013No. 1:06-CV-00939-JSR-SABPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are the motions in limine of defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“Novartis”). Having reviewed the parties’ written submissions and provided them with the opportunity for oral argument, the Court grants the motions in part, denies them in part, and reserves them in part.

On June 29, 2006, plaintiff Chris Hill filed her complaint in San Joaquin County Superior Court against defendants Novartis and “Does 1 through 20,” asserting *948causes of action sounding in strict products liability and in negligence, premised on…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Roderic R. McDowell v. Pernell BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wild v. Catholic Health SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Sanchez v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
  3. Abel v. Oceanic Arcata, LP dba Red Roof InnDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Contreras v. GonzalezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Green v. Safeway IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API