Legal Opinion
Interface Flooring Systems, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 3, 2002No. SC 16602PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The plaintiff, Interface Flooring Systems, Inc., appeals1 from the summary judgment *603rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants2 in this action, contending that they were obligated under certain insurance policies to reimburse the plaintiff for expenses it had incurred in defending against a federal lawsuit brought against it. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that: (1) the law of Georgia rather than the law of Connecticut applied to the substantive issues in the case;3 and (2) the defendant had no obligation to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp. v. Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Serrano v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Dugan v. Mobile Medical Testing Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- American States Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- A Slice of Pie Productions, LLC v. Wayans Bros. EntertainmentDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Aruba Hotel Enterprises N v. v. BelfontiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.