Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Daugherty v. Hickman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Original Proceeding. Plaintiffs haying an adequate remedy by certiorari the writ of prohibition should not issue. State ex rel. v. Bower-man, 40 Mo. App. 576;

1Per curiam

— The respondents are justices of the county court of Jasper county in this state and the relators are citizens of Webb City — a city of the third class situate in said county. This is an original proceeding for a writ of prohibition to restrain said justices from issuing a certain dramshop license.

The relators first made application to the judge of the circuit court of said county for the writ, which was refused; and thereupon an application was made by them to one of the judges of this court, and thereupon a preliminary writ was issued. A return to the writ has been made by respondents by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. State ex rel. Reider v. Moniteau County CourtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. State ex rel. Griffith v. BowermanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Moore v. BaileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Pulliam v. FortMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API