Hartvigsen v. SAIF Corp. (In re Hartvigsen)
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
*621*376The question in this workers' compensation case is whether claimant, whose new/omitted medical condition claim for bilateral deQuervain's tenosynovitis has been denied, is entitled to an assessed attorney fee for gaining employer Adecco's acknowledgment that the condition is compensable and is encompassed within Adecco's original acceptance of a claim for "wrist sprain." Adecco had initially denied responsibility for the condition, on the basis that it was a new condition within the responsibility of claimant's subsequent employer, but ultimately acknowledged responsibility for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Hamilton v. Pacific Skyline, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Johansen v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Crawford v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- SAIF Corp. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
3Cited by1 opinion
- Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2021