Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Crosland

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1996No. 950055PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

This case involves review of Murphy v. Crosland, 886 P.2d 74 (Utah Ct.App.1994), cert. granted, 899 P.2d 1231 (Utah 1995). The court of appeals reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Todd Crosland and held him personally liable for negotiating and executing guarantee agreements on behalf of a corporation operating under suspended status. We affirm.

Todd Crosland was the president, director, and principal shareholder in Crosland Industries. Incorporated in Utah in January 1986, Crosland Industries’ corporate status was suspended on March 1,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pontarelli v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. John Scarpa v. William MurphyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  3. Steenblik v. LichfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Murphy v. CroslandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  5. Oregon v. Champion International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reisbeck v. HCA Health Services of Utah, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Brigham Young University v. Tremco Consultants, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Brigham Young University v. Tremco Consultants, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hi-Country Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Foothills Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Pleasant Grove City v. TerryUtah Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API